Cytotoxic auranofin analogues bearing phosphine, arsine and stibine ligands: A study on the possible role of the ligand on the biological activity.

Three gold(I) linear compounds, sharing the general formula [AuI(LPh3)], have been synthesized and characterized. The nature of the ligand has been modified by moving down among some of the elements of group 15, i.e. phosphorus, arsenic and antimony. The structures of derived compounds have been solved through XRD and the reactivity behaviour towards selected biomolecules has been investigated through a multi-technique approach involving NMR, high-resolution mass spectrometry and IR. Moreover, the biological activity of the investigated compounds has been comparatively analyzed through classical methodologies and the disclosed differences are discussed in detail.

Mechanistic Evaluations of the Effects of Auranofin Triethylphosphine Replacement with a Trimethylphosphite Moiety.

Auranofin, a gold(I)-based complex, is under clinical trials for application as an anticancer agent for the treatment of nonsmall-cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer. In the past years, different derivatives have been developed, modifying gold linear ligands in the search for new gold complexes endowed with a better pharmacological profile. Recently, a panel of four gold(I) complexes, inspired by the clinically established compound auranofin, was reported by our research group. As described, all compounds possess an [Au{P(OMe)3}]+ cationic moiety, in which the triethylphosphine of the parent compound auranofin was replaced with an oxygen-rich trimethylphosphite ligand. The gold(I) linear coordination geometry was complemented by Cl-, Br-, I-, and the auranofin-like thioglucose tetraacetate ligand. As previously reported, despite their close similarity to auranofin, the panel compounds exhibited some peculiar and distinctive features, such as lower log P values which can induce relevant differences in the overall pharmacokinetic profiles. To get better insight into the P-Au strength and stability, an extensive study was carried out for relevant biological models, including three different vasopressin peptide analogues and cysteine, using 31P NMR and LC-ESI-MS. A DFT computational study was also carried out for a better understanding of the theoretical fundamentals of the disclosed differences with regard to triethylphosphine parent compounds.

Highlights of New Strategies to Increase the Efficacy of Transition Metal Complexes for Cancer Treatments.

Although important progress has been made, cancer still remains a complex disease to treat. Serious side effects, the insurgence of resistance and poor selectivity are some of the problems associated with the classical metal-based anti-cancer therapies currently in clinical use. New treatment approaches are still needed to increase cancer patient survival without cancer recurrence. Herein, we reviewed two promising-at least in our opinion-new strategies to increase the efficacy of transition metal-based complexes. First, we considered the possibility of assembling two biologically active fragments containing different metal centres into the same molecule, thus obtaining a heterobimetallic complex. A critical comparison with the monometallic counterparts was done. The reviewed literature has been divided into two groups: the case of platinum; the case of gold. Secondly, the conjugation of metal-based complexes to a targeting moiety was discussed. Particularly, we highlighted some interesting examples of compounds targeting cancer cell organelles according to a third-order targeting approach, and complexes targeting the whole cancer cell, according to a second-order targeting strategy.